320 ogg

320 acc

Flac 44.1khz 1411 kbps

Is one suprier to the other ? What your opinion ?

320 kbps,insane og rip

Yes I been using that but think the acc sound better and the flac sound better but take up more space

higher kbps is usually higher quality (eg. FLAC), which takes up more space.....

most quality rips are 192-320 kbps

i would say 320 is the best because it is high quality without taking up so much space

So 320 acc or og and why not flac if it sounds
better? Or is it cause it take up to much space?

Pimpin Slim Williams wrote:So 320 acc or og and why not flac if it sounds
better? Or is it cause it take up to much space?

not sure if acc or og is better but yeah i usually avoid flac because of the file size

Ok for sure thank man I think ACC on what I been reading is better

i use Easy CD-DA Extractor . I usually rip my stuff at 192 unless it a really tight album then i rip at 320 CBR. I'm not too sure about acc or ogg never really messed with it. What program you use? I know that WAV make it sound really good but it takes up alot of space also.

192